Hi Marc,
+1 for me. Time to close indeed.
Best regards,
Jerome
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Marc.Hadley_at_Sun.COM [mailto:Marc.Hadley_at_Sun.COM]
> Envoyé : mercredi 12 mars 2008 14:46
> À : dev_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
> Objet : Re: JSR311: Response isn't adequate
>
> Not wishing to stifle an interesting debate but I'd like to move
> towards a conclusion ;-). Can we close this issue with the proposal
> below ? It gets Bill an OutputStream that can be used without having
> to implement a MessageBodyWriter while not tying up a service thread
> as desired by Jerome and Stephan. Seems like a reasonable compromise
> to me.
>
> Marc.
>
> On Mar 10, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Marc Hadley wrote:
> >
> > public interface StreamedOutput {
> > void write(OutputStream o);
> > }
> >
> > Which can be returned when you want to do streaming - the
> spec would
> > require implementations to support this type.
>
> ---
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
>