I am voting for (i), the status quo.
/Heiko
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 13:36 -0400, Marc Hadley wrote:
> There's been a lot of discussion of whether or not to expand the
> targets (i.e. what Java artifacts you can use the annotation on) of
> the @*Param annotations (i.e. @PathParam etc al). If we do add targets
> for these annotations I think we also need to do the same for
> @DefaultValue and @Encoded. I'm uncomfortable adding targets that are
> only supported in some implementations so if we do add targets they
> will be required to be supported on resource classes (not providers)
> in all implementations.
>
> Discussion so far has been between Bill, Stephan and myself, I'd like
> to hear from others hence this poll. Please choose from the following
> and reply to the list with your selection. Silence means you don't
> care what happens - how could that be ;-).
>
> Here are the options for target I see:
>
> (i) Parameter. The status quo. Works with any lifecycle.
> (ii) Parameter and field. Spec will warn that use on a field in a
> singleton resource isn't supported.
> (iii) Parameter and field. Spec will require use of a proxy for field
> injection. Pro: singletons can be supported. Con: will affect
> performance. Con: still won't work for simple types, spec will warn
> about this.
> (iv) Parameter, field and method (bean setter). Spec will warn that
> use on a field in a singleton resource isn't supported and that use on
> method will require application-managed thread-local handling. Pro:
> bean setter enable support for singletons. Con: complicated bean
> setters.
> (v) Parameter, field and method (bean setter). Spec will require use
> of a proxy for field and method injection. Same pros and cons as (iii).
>
> Vote early, vote once.
> Marc.
>
> ---
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
>