On 4/11/07, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke_at_gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Dhanji R. Prasanna schrieb:
> >
> > On 4/11/07, *Paul Sandoz* <Paul.Sandoz_at_sun.com
> > <mailto:Paul.Sandoz_at_sun.com>> wrote:
> >
> > ok that makes much more sense now. Yep, should definitely be an enum.
>
> As long as this doesn't limit us in using new status codes...
No it doesnt--the api would consume an interface that the enum implements.
So a user could even cook up their own status codes.