Ken Paulsen wrote:
> Q: Can you provide 2 view handler declarations in the same
> faces-config.xml file?
I don't know. :)
> I'm not 100% against it, but I would rather not for the same reason you
> don't want to make your users add a phase listener for your components.
> It should "just work".
Yeah, I see your point, but, fwiw, that's how Facelets does it. hehe.
I might be easier to put the ViewHandler decl in than requiring users to
download 13 jars. Well, 2, but... :P
> You mean as is done today? No it doesn't hurt much... they are small.
>
> I thought the difference would mostly be psychological. This would
> allow people to include only the ones they want, and would demonstrate
> how to add support for JSFT so that this content could be moved to the
> correct place (the component libraries themselves). And in some cases,
> size does matter... so cutting out 50K (or maybe it's more? I don't
> know), may be worth while.
The cost may an semi-uncontrolled proliferation of jars though. It
should just work... ;)
> Yep... perhaps we can also talk about better taglib.xml support...
Meaning? Is that long the lines of the getJarResources() method?
> naming the "handlers" that facelets declares. Perhaps we can do
Handlers?
--
Jason Lee, SCJP
Software Architect -- Objectstream, Inc.
Mojarra and Mojarra Scales Dev Team
https://mojarra.dev.java.net
https://scales.dev.java.net
http://blogs.steeplesoft.com