I went through several weeks of that... I tried to keep going instead of
resting and ended up w/ pneumonia. Get some rest!
P.S. If you (or anyone else) wants to see a screencast (spread over
several .mpg files) I put together for the JSF 2.0 EG group re:
template-based component authoring... you're welcome to take a look.
there's also an example application w/ it. Jason Lee helped out a lot
in getting this put together... thanks Jason! Here are the links to the
files:
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3853 (EZComp1.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3854 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3855 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3856 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3857 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3858 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3859 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3860 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3861 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3862 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3863 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3864 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3865 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3866 (EZComp2.mpg)
http://mediacast.sun.com/details.jsp?id=3867 (ezcomp.jar -- Example
application: open the README.txt after extracting this jar in its own
directory)
Ken
Michael Phoenix wrote:
> Ken,
>
> No problem. The fact is, I'm probably not going to get to it as quick
> as I thought because this crappy cold that seemed to be on the wane
> yesterday is kicking my butt today.
>
> Mike
>
> On 10/31/07, *Ken Paulsen* <Ken.Paulsen_at_sun.com
> <mailto:Ken.Paulsen_at_sun.com>> wrote:
>
>
> I'm sorry I missed your email! Yes, please go ahead and make
> these changes. As for content, I can provide you w/ what you
> need... however, at the moment I don't have time to sit down and
> write it. You can either start w/ an outline, or create a page
> with most of the content missing... or just hold off for now on
> things you're unsure of. After I finish the article for
> java.sun.com <http://java.sun.com>, finish the screencast for JSR
> 314, review the new GlassFish book, and work on a couple
> high-priority tasks for my day-job... then I should have more
> time. Even though I have a lot to do... the good news is that it
> is all due yesterday, so it shouldn't last too long. ;)
>
> Ken
>
>
> Michael Phoenix wrote:
>> Ummm, so I've been waiting about a week for approval on these
>> changes......
>>
>> On 10/23/07, *Michael Phoenix* < michaelandrewphoenix_at_gmail.com
>> <mailto:michaelandrewphoenix_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> OK, I'm trying to get approval for making Web page
>> modifications to correct stuff that I don't have questions
>> on. As soon as get the OK on the latter I'll start making
>> changes.
>>
>> 1. I'm going to add to the tutorial page a brief description
>> of how the UI components are named in the factory files as
>> Leonid described in an answer to my question on this.
>>
>> 2. Do some googling on facets and link to good sources in the
>> tutorial where facets are mentioned.
>>
>> 3. Put a link to Leonid's docs on handlers in the tutorial.
>>
>> We still need documentation on events and the project
>> architecture. Is there anybody with the necessary knowledge
>> and time to do this? I have the time, but not the
>> understanding of JSFT internals.
>>
>> As soon as get the OK I'll start on the changes that I can make.
>>
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: *Ken Paulsen* < Ken.Paulsen_at_sun.com
>> <mailto:Ken.Paulsen_at_sun.com>>
>> Date: Sep 25, 2007 9:18 AM
>> Subject: Re: recommendations for JSFT
>> website/Google calendar down
>> To: Michael Phoenix <
>> michaelandrewphoenix_at_gmail.com
>> <mailto:michaelandrewphoenix_at_gmail.com>>
>> Cc: Ken Paulsen < Ken.Paulsen_at_sun.com
>> <mailto:Ken.Paulsen_at_sun.com>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Michael Phoenix wrote:
>>> Hi Ken,
>>>
>>> Are we having a meeting tomorrow? If so, you may
>>> want to send out a reminder, because google
>>> calendars appears to be down.
>> Ok, thanks for letting me know... reminder sent.
>>> i've also gone over the JSFT website. Here are
>>> some questions/observations on the tutorials and
>>> set ups.
>>>
>>> 1) Is "sun:" always the prefix for components?
>>> If not, where is the code that handles setting
>>> the tag prefix?
>> No... the annotation in the "factory" file
>> specifies this. The "sun:" components are the
>> "Woodstock" components. There is some mapping
>> facility implemented in JSFTemplating, however,
>> only the Facelets syntax currently supports
>> this... we need to implement this in the
>> "template" syntax as well.
>>
>>
>> OK, so where is the 'factory" file located? There is
>> nothing with a similar filename in the project.
>>
>>> 2) Facets really should be better explained.
>>> Maybe even a link to an online source outside of
>>> java.net <http://java.net> would be a good idea.
>> Facets or Facelets? I agree, we can and should
>> link to info on both.
>>
>>
>> I was talking about facets, although we really should
>> have documentation on all the facelets work and how
>> to use it as well. I can actually probably find a
>> link to the facets documentation on-line. Those folks
>> who have worked on the facelets stuff should write
>> up some good docs for the website.
>>
>>> 3) Event and Handlers needs A LOT of work. It
>>> doesn't come close to explaining to a novice how
>>> and why s/he should use these.
>> Yes, I agree... Leonid Lamburt recently provided
>> an HTML page that begins to explain the
>> difference between handlers, we still don't have
>> anything that explains the advantages and
>> when/why you'd use an event.
>>
>>
>> https://jsftemplating.dev.java.net/doc/eventsHandlersList.html
>>
>>
>> I can put a link to this in the tutorial.
>>
>>> 4) Finally, for developers on the JSFT project,
>>> it would be good to have an area that talks
>>> about the project architecture including the
>>> important classes.
>> Yes again! :)
>>
>>
>> Who can do this? It needs to be somebody who
>> understands the project well.
>>
>>> In the future, should I be sending these sort of
>>> emails directly to the developer list?
>> Yes, that would be fine... others can then reply
>> and send in their opinions as well.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Ken
>>
>>
>>
>>
>