dev@jsftemplating.java.net

Re: JSFTemplating: JSFTemplating project goals (JSFTemplating vs Facelet)

From: Ken Paulsen <Ken.Paulsen_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:29:40 -0700

Leonid Lamburt wrote:
> Ken,
>
> thanks for the reply.
>
> Sorry to bug you, but I have a follow up question.
>
> You said:
> 'Probably not the facelets components -- JSFT supports "real"
> components instead'.
>
> What makes a component real (vs what, virtual) ?
A real component:

* Has an associated UIComponent
* Can perform "decode" functionality
* Has a Renderer associated with it (in JSFT's case, that Renderer is
usually controlled via a template file)
* Can be used in ANY JSF environment (JSP, JSFTemplating, Facelets, etc.)
* Follows the JSF specification
> Also, real means better, right?
Yes, I think so.
> Maybe, it's possible to go over some specific example.
Have you seen this article?

http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=JSFTemplateComponent

I am working with Jason Lee on a better article that makes component
creation even easier... only 2 files that you have to touch.
> Again, sorry to bother you with this, but I just started with JSF, and
> I couldn't find any good source for JSF architecture documentation.
It's no problem at all... I'm sure many others have the same questions
you have. By asking the questions (which are very good questions, btw),
you're helping others.

Thanks!

Ken
>
>
> Thanks again.
> LL
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> A place for moms to take a break!
> http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us