>>>>> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:13:18 -0500, Jason Lee <jasondlee_at_sun.com> said:
JL> Many moons ago, I began the effort (at Ken Paulsen's request and with
JL> the Woodstock team's blessing) to migrate the Woodstock JSF metadata
JL> annotations (@Component, @Renderer, @Property) and the associated
JL> processor to the JSF Extensions source tree, with Ed's blessing. For
JL> the curious, the use of the annotations was documented in the article
JL> Ken and I wrote (
http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2EE/jsf_templating/index.html
JL> ) as well as one of my presentations at JSFOne (
http://hg.steeplesoft.com/jsfone-comps/file/f9d1f13c275f
JL> ).
JL> Since Ed is out of the country, I spoke with Roger about the merge,
JL> and he gave me a conditional OK, but requested I post a diff to the
JL> dev list, so here it is. I put the annotations under dev-time, so I
JL> moved what was there to dev-time/misc, and made dev-time/pom.xml a
JL> multi-module pom. The artifact ID for what was there did not change,
JL> so end users should not see any changes. If there are no complaints,
JL> I'd like to commit my merge and get these two now annotation artifacts
JL> published. Thanks! :)
I don't see the new files for the annotations. In any case, I trust
that they're there. Since JSF 2.0 already has these annotations, can
you please check them into the jsf-extensions-0.1 branch?
r=edburns
https://jsf-extensions.dev.java.net/svn/jsf-extensions/branches/jsf-extensions-0_1_BRANCH
Thanks,
Ed
Ed