Well, more correctly... the spec is silent on the matter. It does not
say it is allowed, nor does it say it is disallowed.
On Tue 02 Apr 2013 01:00:54 PM CDT, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Correct. That is allowed.
>
> On Tue 02 Apr 2013 10:42:30 AM CDT, Christian von Kutzleben wrote:
>> Dear group,
>>
>> Am I right in the assumption, that reading or writing
>> fields/properties of a removed
>> entity (prior to commit) is allowed?
>>
>> I.e. the following sequence is valid:
>>
>> em.remove(o);
>> o.setMyField(42);
>> em.getTransaction().commit();
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian von Kutzleben
>> Chief Engineer | Versant GmbH
>> (T) +49 40 60990-0
>> (F) +49 40 60990-113
>> (E) cvkutzleben_at_versant.com <mailto:cromberg_at_versant.com>
>> www.versant.com <http://www.versant.com> | www.db4o.com
>> <http://www.db4o.com>
>>
>> --
>> Versant
>> GmbH is incorporated in Germany. Company registration number: HRB
>> 54723, Amtsgericht Hamburg. Registered Office: Halenreie 42, 22359
>> Hamburg, Germany. Geschäftsführer: Bernhard Wöbker, Volker John
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY
>> NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole
>> use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or
>> proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
>> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
>> immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of
>> the original message.