jsr338-experts@jpa-spec.java.net

[jsr338-experts] Re: new spec draft (Final Release candidate)

From: Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:36:31 -0700

Hi Scott,

Yes, I will make the change.

-Linda


On 3/19/2013 12:53 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:
> Hi Linda,
>
> In 7.9.2, we should change "container" to "provider":
>
> "
> When the JTA transaction rolls back, the provider must detach all managed entities if the persistence context is of type
> SynchronizationType.SYNCHRONIZED or has otherwise been joined to the transaction. Note that the JTA transaction may
> rollback in a background thread (e.g., as a result of transaction timeout), in which case the *provider* should arrange
> for the managed entities to be detached from the persistence context but not concurrently while the application is in an
> EntityManager invocation.
> "
>
> Scott
>
> On 03/19/2013 03:40 PM, Linda DeMichiel wrote:
>> I've just uploaded a new spec draft and javadocs to our project
>> downloads area: http://java.net/projects/jpa-spec/downloads
>>
>> These reflect the recent updates to the StoredProcedureQuery
>> interface, clarifications with regard to transaction rollback on a
>> background thread, and minor clarification to the result of the
>> EMF.getCache method. Changebars reflect changes since the Proposed
>> Final Draft.
>>
>> We are closing in on the Java EE 7 target release date.
>> Please therefore let me know if you find any issues with this
>> draft, or any reason that it should not be submitted for the
>> JPA 2.1 Final Release.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> -Linda
>