On 7 sept. 2011, at 19:30, Linda DeMichiel wrote:
> In any event, I'm inclined to address this particular item with a note in section 11.1.40 to the
> effect that "It is not expected that a database foreign key be defined for the OneToOne mapping,
> as the OneToOne relationship may be defined as "optional=true".
>
> Please let me know if any of you disagree.
Fine by me.