Hi Werner,
I searched in the proposal and in the mailing lists but couldn't find anything similar.
I'm happy with another solution as well.
adam
On 18.06.2011, at 13:48, Werner Keil wrote:
> Why the different name pattern for the last proposed?
> They would all fulfill the same purpose.
>
> Cheers,
> Werner
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:06:03 +0200
>> Von: Adam Bien <abien_at_adam-bien.com>
>> An: jsr338-experts_at_jpa-spec.java.net
>> Betreff: [jsr338-experts] Standardized Access to ChangeSet
>
>> HI All,
>>
>> I would like to propose additional EntityManager methods:
>>
>> Set<Class> updated = EntityManager#getUpdatedEntities(Class<T>.class);
>> Set<Class> deleted = EntityManager#getDeletedEntities(Class<T>.class);
>> Set<Class> created = EntityManager#getCreatedEntities(Class<T>.class);
>> Set<Class> dirty = EntityManager#getDirty(Class<T>.class);
>>
>> We had to use provider-specific EntityManager extensions to access the
>> dirty entities for the implementation of replication or historization.
>>
>> Such methods would be also useful for debugging purposes,
>>
>> thanks in advance,
>>
>> adam
>>
>>
>
> --
> NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren!
> Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone