I'm confused by this call:
JMSContext ctx2 = ctx.createJMSContext();
Did you mean something else?
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> SE for now...
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:02 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Is this an EE scenario or an SE scenario?
>> I think the behavior differs in the two environments.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>> clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My same question also applies to everything else... such as
>>> setExceptionListener, getMetaData(), etc...
>>>
>>>
>>> Should the state be shared with multiple JMSContexts or each context
>>> should be totally independent?
>>>
>>> We have talked about this before, but I don't see any wording on how
>>> this sharing of the state should be done.
>>>
>>> since this is using the building pattern I would expect a
>>> jmsContext.createContext() would be sharing the same data.... again.. I
>>> just want to check if that's everybody's interpretation...
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> Clebert
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>> clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> say you created a JMSContext, and used setClientID....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> JMSContext ctx = ...
>>>> ctx.setClientID("someID");
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Say, if later we call:
>>>>
>>>> JMSContext ctx2 = ctx.createJMSContext();
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What would be the expected value of ctx2.getClientID() ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm assuming there will be some connection reused by the JMSContext and
>>>> ctx.createJMSContext() would reuse the internal connection as we talked
>>>> earlier. I'm just double checking if this is everybody's expectations...?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Clebert
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Clebert Suconic
>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>