SE for now...
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:02 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> Is this an EE scenario or an SE scenario?
> I think the behavior differs in the two environments.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> My same question also applies to everything else... such as
>> setExceptionListener, getMetaData(), etc...
>>
>>
>> Should the state be shared with multiple JMSContexts or each context
>> should be totally independent?
>>
>> We have talked about this before, but I don't see any wording on how this
>> sharing of the state should be done.
>>
>> since this is using the building pattern I would expect a
>> jmsContext.createContext() would be sharing the same data.... again.. I
>> just want to check if that's everybody's interpretation...
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Clebert
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>> clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> say you created a JMSContext, and used setClientID....
>>>
>>>
>>> JMSContext ctx = ...
>>> ctx.setClientID("someID");
>>>
>>>
>>> Say, if later we call:
>>>
>>> JMSContext ctx2 = ctx.createJMSContext();
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What would be the expected value of ctx2.getClientID() ?
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm assuming there will be some connection reused by the JMSContext and
>>> ctx.createJMSContext() would reuse the internal connection as we talked
>>> earlier. I'm just double checking if this is everybody's expectations...?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Clebert
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>
>
>
--
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com