+1
At first glance, this definitely sounds unintuitive.
Gili
On 2015-10-06 3:29 AM, Grzesiek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A couple of weeks ago I've created a bug ticket JERSEY-2942.
> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-2942> Unfortunately this ticket
> has been closed quite fast with the status "Works as designed". But I
> believe this is a misunderstanding.
> In the issue's comments you can read a short discussion on this topic.
>
> Generally, IMO current Jersey behavior is quite ridiculous, because
> when having exactly matching method to serve a *GET /api/users/1*
> request - Jersey chooses method annotated with *_at_DELETE*. No other
> JAX-RS implementations that I'm aware of (Apache CXF and RESTeasy)
> behaves this way.
>
>
> But I know I could be wrong here. What do you think?
> Any insights are appreciated.
>
> Regards
> Greg