[Jersey] Re: Jersey Repackaging

From: cowwoc <>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:47:17 -0400

Part of the solution is for Jersey to be more proactive in updating its
dependencies. Keeping up-to-date with the latest releases isn't a lot of


On 25/08/2014 3:42 PM, Mark Thornton wrote:
> Perhaps because not all build systems in use have something equivalent
> to shade. Also where the version used by jersey is particularly old
> (such as asm), far too many users would have to do the same repackaging.
> Mark Thornton
> On Monday, 25 August 2014, Robert DiFalco <
> <>> wrote:
> Does the Jersey repackaged stuff mean that if I am using Guava in
> my project that there will be duplicate classes for all the stuff
> Jersey repackaged? Why is this a better idea than letting people
> use shade or something similar?