[Jersey] Re: Jersey Repackaging

From: Mark Thornton <>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:42:01 +0100

Perhaps because not all build systems in use have something equivalent to
shade. Also where the version used by jersey is particularly old (such as
asm), far too many users would have to do the same repackaging.

Mark Thornton

On Monday, 25 August 2014, Robert DiFalco <> wrote:

> Does the Jersey repackaged stuff mean that if I am using Guava in my
> project that there will be duplicate classes for all the stuff Jersey
> repackaged? Why is this a better idea than letting people use shade or
> something similar?