users@jersey.java.net

[Jersey] Re: Jersey 2.7 giving up on jdk 1.6?

From: Trolly Rogers <trolly.s.rogers_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:47:57 -0400

Ouch, that's disappointing.

So users ...what would you do? Stick with 2.6 until my big slow
organization upgrades our JVMs to 1.7, or remain in the dark ages with
jaxrs 1.x knowing I'll at least get some critical patches if needed. Dang,
this sucks!


On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Noah White <emailnbw_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Works for me.
>
> -Noah
>
> On Mar 17, 2014, at 12:04 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
>
> > That seems to be a broken link. It redirects to
> https://home.java.net/?force=689
> >
> > Gili
> >
> > On 17/03/2014 9:47 AM, Vetle Leinonen-Roeim wrote:
> >> Seems like Java SE 7 is required now, just saw this pop up on the
> jersey-commits mailing list:
> https://java.net/projects/jersey/lists/commits/archive/2014-03/message/109
> >>
> >> On 15.03.14 01:15, Trolly Rogers wrote:
> >>> Folks - Jersey documentation regarding java SE compatibility says "All
> >>> Jersey components are compiled with Java SE 6 target.", but that's not
> >>> the case with this latest 2.7 release. A number of components have
> >>> manifest files that say Build-Jdk: 1.7.0_51, and of course it bombs out
> >>> on my 1.6 containers.
> >>>
> >>> Are going to get a jdk 1.6 build? (pretty please)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Also, after swapping out jackson for moxy for my json stuff, my server
> >>> startups got MUCH slower, anyone experience this?
> >>
> >
>
>