users@jersey.java.net

[Jersey] Re: Jersey 2.7 giving up on jdk 1.6?

From: Marek Potociar <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:46:07 +0100

Here is the updated release notes link:
https://jersey.java.net/release-notes/2.7.html

Marek

On 17 Mar 2014, at 16:33, Trolly Rogers <trolly.s.rogers_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> For some reason that link isn't working for me. Would you be able to paste or give me some more details?
>
> I was really hoping the SE 7 requirement was an oversight. I really want to upgrade to the latest Jersey, but unfortunately my organization won't be upgrading our servers for a while.
>
> So Jersey folks, are you done with 1.6? I gotta figure out a path forward here.... if I stick with Jersey 2.6 I figure I'll get screwed out of any updates presuming they'll all be built on 1.7. Alternatively, I can port my app back to Jersey 1.x. It's like a lose lose situation for me here unless Jersey 2 supports 1.6.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Vetle Leinonen-Roeim <vetle_at_roeim.net> wrote:
> Seems like Java SE 7 is required now, just saw this pop up on the jersey-commits mailing list: https://java.net/projects/jersey/lists/commits/archive/2014-03/message/109
>
>
> On 15.03.14 01:15, Trolly Rogers wrote:
> Folks - Jersey documentation regarding java SE compatibility says "All
> Jersey components are compiled with Java SE 6 target.", but that's not
> the case with this latest 2.7 release. A number of components have
> manifest files that say Build-Jdk: 1.7.0_51, and of course it bombs out
> on my 1.6 containers.
>
> Are going to get a jdk 1.6 build? (pretty please)
>
>
> Also, after swapping out jackson for moxy for my json stuff, my server
> startups got MUCH slower, anyone experience this?
>
>