Thanks, it's different from Guice Binding grammar
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/LinkedBindings
Best regards,
Ivan
On 3/10/14, 1:47 AM, Robert DiFalco wrote:
> No, MyService is an interface so it is the contract. MyServiceImp is
> the implementation of MyService. So for example if you had a Spring
> ApplicationContext you could even make that Spring Bean instance
> injectable like this:
>
> register( applicationCtx.getBean( MyService.class ),
> MyService.class );
>
> Make sense? In this case I'm binding a specific instance of
> MyService.class (a Bean instance) to the MyService interface contract.
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Ivan Li <email2liyang_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:email2liyang_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> should be bind( MyService.class ).to( MyServiceImpl.class );
>
> right?
>
> Best regards,
> Ivan
>
> On 3/9/14, 1:07 AM, Robert DiFalco wrote:
>> Answering my own question here:
>>
>> Don't use register in RestConfig. Instead create an
>> AbstractBinder with the service to inject.
>>
>> register( new AbstractBinder() {
>> @Override
>> protected void configure() {
>> bind( MyServiceImpl.class ).to( MyService.class );
>> }
>> });
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Robert DiFalco
>> <robert.difalco_at_gmail.com <mailto:robert.difalco_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> How do I make a service available for injection with Jersey 2.6?
>>
>> I simply want to have something like:
>>
>> @Inject
>> private MyService service;
>>
>> In a resource. I assumed in my configuration I could just do
>> this:
>>
>> register( MyService.class );
>>
>> But apparently that doesn't work. What's the simplest way to make
>> MyResource @Inject-able with MyService in 2.6?
>>
>> TIA!
>>
>> R.
>>
>>
>
>