+1 on that!
—joe
On Mar 5, 2014, at 8:42 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
> https://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-1952
>
> It was my understanding that you wouldn't close legitimate Jersey 1.x bugs just because Jersey 2.x exists? Jersey 2.x is actually worse in this regard (unit tests are even less flexible than in 1.x).
>
> Please reopen this issue until Jersey 2.x gains feature parity with 1.x and majority community support. Most of us still need Jersey 1.x support.
>
> Thank you,
> Gili