Hi Marek,
When one files a pull request, Github automatically creates a new Github
issue for it.
I guess this means you'll have to manually reopen the two pull-requests
you closed (the top two entries in
https://github.com/jersey/jersey-1.x/pulls?direction=desc&page=1&sort=created&state=closed)
Gili
On 25/03/2014 10:03 AM, Marek Potociar wrote:
> I have not closed anything explicitly. The only explanation I have is
> that your pull request may have been automatically closed by github
> infrastructure when I deleted the Jersey 1.x github issue tracker
> (since we have been tracking issues on java.net <http://java.net> Jira
> and I have noticed that somehow the repository
> <https://github.com/jersey/jersey-1.x/> was misconfigured to support
> issue tracking). Is that the case? Did you somehow bind the pull
> request to a github issue?
>
> Marek
>
> On 24 Mar 2014, at 18:47, cowwoc <cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org
> <mailto:cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On the one hand you expect the community to contribute "any new
>> features or minor improvements & annoyance fixes in 1.x code base".
>> On the other hand when I tried to do precisely that
>> (https://github.com/jersey/jersey-1.x/pull/5) I waited 3 weeks for a
>> reply, and then you closed the pull request without merging the
>> changes or leaving a comment.
>>
>> How is the community supposed to work under these conditions?
>>
>> Gili
>>
>>
>> On 17/03/2014 10:25 AM, Marek Potociar wrote:
>>> Hi Gili,
>>>
>>> As the closing comment suggests ("Minor issue, will not fix in the
>>> sustained code."), this is a minor issue in our view. As such we are
>>> not going to fix it in Jersey 1.x as this code has been moved to
>>> sustaining mode and we do not have cycles to fix such minor issues
>>> in a sustained code base. We will still be delivering fixes for
>>> critical bugs discovered in 1.x code base. However any new features
>>> or minor improvements & annoyance fixes in 1.x code base are left
>>> for community contribution.
>>>
>>> Feel free to open feature requests against Jersey 2.x for any
>>> features you are missing there.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Marek
>>>
>>> On 06 Mar 2014, at 05:42, cowwoc <cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org
>>> <mailto:cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-1952
>>>>
>>>> It was my understanding that you wouldn't close legitimate Jersey
>>>> 1.x bugs just because Jersey 2.x exists? Jersey 2.x is actually
>>>> worse in this regard (unit tests are even less flexible than in 1.x).
>>>>
>>>> Please reopen this issue until Jersey 2.x gains feature parity with
>>>> 1.x and majority community support. Most of us still need Jersey
>>>> 1.x support.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Gili
>>>
>>
>