On 13/12/2013 4:41 PM, Robert DiFalco wrote:
> I'm migrating from Jersey 1.9 to 2.x. Wow, what a lot of odds and ends
> to relearn. It looks like Moxy is preferred over Jackson (which I use
> in other parts of my code). I can make this change but before I do I
> have some questions:
> 1. Why is MOXy the "preferred" approach for Jersey 2.x?
> 2. Why was it selected over Jackson?
> 3. Have there been any speed comparisons between Moxy and Jackson
> for POJO mapping?
> 4. Should I just stick with Jackson for Jersey 2.x or will I get
> some special goodness from MOXy that I wont with Jackson?
My guess is that this is related to
http://blog.bdoughan.com/2013/06/moxy-is-new-default-json-binding.html
I second your question about MOXy though, because in my experience
Jackson is a 1st-class library that should be the default. It also has a
longer positive track record than MOXy.
Gili