Okay. That's good news.
Thanks,
Gili
On 09/11/2013 9:53 AM, Richard Kolb wrote:
>
> Hi Gili
>
> Weblogic ships with a JAXRS implementation based on Jersey as far as I
> can see :
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/web.1111/e13734/rest.htm
> So even if I put my most pessimistic hat on, I would say no they won't
> pull people off it.
> But then again, I don't know for sure :)
>
> Oracle had two commercially supported products that competed directly
> against each other which was confusing.
> They merely took away the one.
>
> I've seen a lot of Jersey versions come out since the release of
> JavaEE 7, and I don't expect it to stop.
>
> regards
> Richard
>
>
> On 9 November 2013 09:25, cowwoc <cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org
> <mailto:cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> I guess what I'm asking is: now that Oracle will be making less
> money off of Glassfish, does it plan to pull Oracle employees off
> those and related projects such as Jersey?
>
> Thanks,
> Gili
>
>
> On 09/11/2013 2:02 AM, Richard Kolb wrote:
>> Hi Gili
>>
>> As I see it , it only effects people who already have commercial
>> support for Glassfish 3.x and plan to move to Glassfish 4.x and
>> bring along the support.
>> It does not effect anyone who continues with a Glassfish 3.x
>> support agreement.
>>
>> So if you don't plan on official supported commercial version on
>> Glassfish 4.x, it will not effect you or the development of
>> Glassfish and related projects.
>> You can still run Glassfish in prod.
>> Indeed it may actually help the development of Glassfish and
>> related projects.
>>
>> Some more info here :
>> https://blogs.oracle.com/brunoborges/entry/6_facts_about_glassfish_announcement
>>
>>
>>
>> regards
>> Richard.
>>
>>
>> On 9 November 2013 08:38, cowwoc <cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org
>> <mailto:cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org>> wrote:
>>
>> https://blogs.oracle.com/theaquarium/entry/java_ee_and_glassfish_server
>>
>> Does Oracle plan to pull developers off of
>> Glassfish/Jersey? How will this affect Jersey and JAX-RS
>> development?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Gili
>>
>>
>
>