users@jersey.java.net

[Jersey] Re: Jersey client: Asynchronous requests

From: cowwoc <cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:13:57 -0500

I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one. Did you run into the same errors
as me? https://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-2173

Gili

On 12/11/2013 9:49 AM, Rafael Winterhalter wrote:
>
> Hi Marek,
>
> Thank you for your quick reply. I sent in the agreement.
>
> I just wanted to add that I was not able to run the unit tests of the
> current snapshot without test failures (without my changes). Also, the
> GitHub CloudBees gives me errors. I would not know how to fix either.
>
> Best regards, Rafael
>
> *From:*Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 12, 2013 3:27 PM
> *To:* users_at_jersey.java.net
> *Subject:* [Jersey] Re: Jersey client: Asynchronous requests
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Thank you for both contributions. Before we can proceed with the
> review & eventually accept these pull requests, we need to ask you to
> sign Oracle Contributors Agreement (OCA):
>
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
>
> From the linked page:
>
> /An OCA can be remitted for acceptance by emailing a scanned,
> completed, signed copy to oracle-ca_us [at] oracle [dot] com. Or, you
> may use that email address to request a fax number for remittance of
> hard copy./
>
> Thank you,
>
> Marek
>
> On 12 Nov 2013, at 14:39, Rafael Winterhalter
> <Rafael.Winterhalter_at_kantega.no
> <mailto:Rafael.Winterhalter_at_kantega.no>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hey,
>
> I suggested to changes to the Jersey client's asynchronous behavior
> since I was recently implementing a bigger Jersey client application
> and I did not find the Jersey client to work as expected:
>
> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/pull/38
>
> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/pull/39
>
> I do of course not know if you want to consider my code changes but I
> strongly suggest to update the Java doc of
> ClientProperties.ASYNC_THREADPOOL_SIZE since it does not inform about
> the fact that this property is currently ignored. This is merely noted
> in a TODO in the source code and thus not as visible as it should be.
>
> Best, Rafael
>