Perfect! That was exactly what I needed. Now the ResourceMethodDispatchProvider is a pure decorator.
Thanks!
--
Coda Hale
http://codahale.com
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 at 6:07 PM, George Sapountzis wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Coda Hale <coda.hale_at_gmail.com (mailto:coda.hale_at_gmail.com)> wrote:
> > I agree, it's not a good fit, but the API is a) not really documented regarding overall behavior and b) mostly implemented in private classes.
> >
> > If folks here have a better idea for how to decorate the underlying ResourceMethodDispatch instance in a cleaner way, I'd change this in a heartbeat.
>
> haven't looked at the code but there is a
> ResourceMethodDispatchAdapter extension point which may be useful