Hi Pavel
Thank you for your kind reply.
The code: webResource.path("test?location").get(String.class); will encode
character *?* to *%3F*(url encode), that means the request url will be *
http://test.com/test%3Flocation* instead of *
http://test.com/test?location*.
If someone use unencoded url like *
http://test.com/test?location*, Jersey
will return 405 'MethodNotAllowed' response.
Best regards.
Zijian
2011/11/15 Pavel Bucek <pavel.bucek_at_oracle.com>
> Hi 王子剑,
>
> please use users_at_jersey.java.net mailing list, this one is for mailing
> list administration only.
>
> And about your issue - it can be achieved, you need to exclude requests
> containing question mark from first method. See following:
>
> @GET
> @Path("{people:[^\\?]*}")
> public String getPeople(@PathParam("people") String people) {
> return people;
>
> }
>
> @GET
> @Path("{people}?location")
> public String getLocation(@PathParam("people") String people) {
> return "location:" + people;
> }
>
> I verified this with following requests:
>
> responseMsg = webResource.path("test").get(String.class); //
> matches getPeople
> responseMsg = webResource.path("test?location").get(String.class);
> // matches getLocation
>
> Regards,
> Pavel
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/15/11 11:10 AM, 王子剑 wrote:
>
> Hello All
>
> I am handling a legacy system and I cannot process the request by Jersey
> gracefully.
>
> API:
>
> *GET : http://test.com/{people} * Get people information
>
> *GET : http://test.com/{people}?location* Get people location.
>
>
>
> Code
>
> *_at_GET*
> *_at_Path("{people}")*
> *public People getPeopleInformation(String people);*
> *
> *
> *_at_GET*
> *_at_Path("{people}?location")*
> *public People getPeopleLocation(String people);*
> *
> *
>
> Jersey will not invoke the second method *getPeopleLocation *when the
> client request url: *http://test.com/{people}?location*, it always
> dispatch the incoming request which end with '?location' to the first
> method '*getPeopleInformation*'.
>
> Is there some way to let Jersey to dispatch request based on query
> parameters like this situation?
> *
> *
> *
> *
>
>
>