Exactly!
From: Rob - [mailto:skyscrapper666_at_hotmail.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 12. April 2011 03:30
To: users_at_jersey.java.net
Subject: [Jersey] Re: SVN, GIT or MERCURIAL for Jersey 2.0?
+1 SVN
Ain't broken.. don't fix it.
________________________________
From: tauren_at_groovee.com
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:18:48 -0700
To: users_at_jersey.java.net
Subject: [Jersey] Re: SVN, GIT or MERCURIAL for Jersey 2.0?
Absolutely and positively a +1 Git vote from me!
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Arul Dhesiaseelan <aruld_at_acm.org>
wrote:
+1 for Mercurial as it is very easy to get going than Git. I have used
both Git and Mercurial and prefer the later for its super simplicity.
Here is a decent analysis for Git vs Hg
(
http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis) for its technical
merits.
-Arul
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Ryan Stewart <rds6235_at_gmail.com> wrote:
git
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Marek Potociar
<marek.potociar_at_oracle.com> wrote:
Hey Folks,
For Jersey 2.x we are considering to switch our VCS from SVN into Git or
Mercurial. Sticking to SVN is still an option
too. FWIW, here's my take on the topic: