On Jun 30, 2010, at 6:39 PM, Roberto Chinnici wrote:
> Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Hi Roberto,
>>
>> When you fixed issue 510 it appears have also fixed another issue
>> found with the 1.2 code that was logged later on, see:
>>
>> https://jersey.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=539
>>
>> I am guessing that from your comments in 510:
>>
>> It's a lot worse than that. The following call throws an
>> ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException:
>> Base64.encode(new byte[] {(byte)128});
>>
>> but i want to confirm before closing 539 as a dup of 510.
>
> Yes, while working on #510, I fixed the issue later reported as #539
> too.
> I also added some unit tests to check proper handling of bytes > 0x7F.
>
Thanks, closed 539 as a dup of 510.
Paul.