On Mar 2, 2010, at 2:33 AM, Mike Baranczak wrote:
>
> Yeah, it was way old - 2.6.2 to be exact. I was able to replace it
> with
> 2.9.1, and everything works beautifully now.
>
> I'm not crazy about the idea of requiring some specific parser
> library. I
> think the default behavior of Jersey should be the same as it is now
> - use
> whatever parser the JRE gives you, and if that doesn't work, let the
> developer deal with it. But I do like the idea of an optional
> setting in
> Jersey to force a specific parser implementation.
Such as declaring the name of SAXParserFactory class to use in a
servlet init-param?
Paul.
> Most people wouldn't need
> it, but it'd be very useful in some situations.