users@jersey.java.net

Re: [Jersey] Webkit issue for revisions after 1.1.3-ea

From: Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:26:07 +0100

On Nov 30, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Daniel Shaw wrote:

> We're using implicit views.
>
> Actually, I first encountered the issue with 1.1.5-ea-SNAPSHOT
> because I wanted to check out the new Tracing feature. I then
> stepped back through the 1.1.4.x release and finally had to revert
> to 1.1.3-ea.
>
> Kind of swamped getting ready for a release and I don't have any
> show stoppers rolling out on a previous version, but I'll definitely
> try to pull something together so we can explore this further.
>

OK.

FWIW i tested the bookstore sample on Firefox and Safari and could not
reproduce, HTML was correctly returned in each case.

Paul.

> Thanks,
>
> Daniel Shaw
> i: http://dshaw.com
> c: http://www.linkedin.com/in/dshaw
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_sun.com>
> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Are you using explicit or implicit views?
>
> As the other Daniel ( :-) ) says the @ ImplicitProduces (see the
> bookstore sample) might work but it still does not explain why
> things previously worked for you.
>
> Have you tried 1.1.5-ea-SNAPSHOT?
>
> I recently found a regression in 1.1.4.x that i fixed in 1.1.5-ea-
> SNAPSHOT. The regression was that if you set any headers and status
> code (in a built Response or response filter) they are ignored for
> JSP views (the flushing of headers was not occurring before the
> servlet forwarding to the JSP).
>
> If 1.1.5-ea-SNAPSHOT does not work then can you send me a simple
> test case and i can investigate.
>
> Paul.
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2009, at 9:43 PM, Daniel Shaw wrote:
>
>> We're using MVCJ backing some JSPs and on any of the revisions
>> after 1.1.3-ea, I'm getting the following error for any Webkit
>> browser (Safari and Chrome, in my case tested on Mac): "Resource
>> interpreted as document but transferred with MIME type application/
>> xml." In every case, Webkit does not even process the page. View
>> source shows a blank page. Firefox loads everything without any
>> problems.
>>
>> I've been digging through the change logs to try to find what might
>> be going on. However, I have yet to come up with a lead. I'm hoping
>> someone else has encountered the same issue. Thanks.
>>
>> Daniel Shaw
>> i: http://dshaw.com
>> c: http://www.linkedin.com/in/dshaw
>
>