On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Cemo Koc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I believe that at the mail list, java.net, and other sites there
> are great
> resources for jersey users. However I strongly believe that Providers
> section at the documentation of Jersey and JAX-RS is very poor.
>
I know you raise a good point. In general we need to improve the user
guide, it is just the time it takes.
IMHO for the most part the JavaDoc is reasonable but it does not
define a linear narrative or an intuitive ToC for developers.
I want to at least do the following to the user guide. Document spring
support (more detail than the tech tip) and document the client side
(based on the white paper). These two require less work because stuff
is already written and for the most part it requires a transformation
into DocBook.
Paul.
> I wish that there should be one comprehensive example about all the
> techniques Paul mentioned above. :) Because extending Jersey with
> custom
> behaviours is the most important thing for legacy applications.
>
> And the last thing, I am very grateful for your helps Paul. Thanks
> again.
>
> Cemo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Adding-new-annotations-to-Jersey-tp3984847p3998795.html
> Sent from the Jersey mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>