check out this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/2cd411dd1f2f5b4a#
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_sun.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 6:49 PM, Tatu Saloranta wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_sun.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Tatu Saloranta wrote:
>>>
>> ...
>>
>>> XMLBeans? JiBX?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Most data binding frameworks will probably have issues, due to
>>>> security limitations or missing classes. It's not so much the security
>>>> manager policies (which I understand -- and accept as a price of
>>>> otherwise really neat option for deployment) but rather missing
>>>> classes, and related problems that get you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> +1 Well put.
>>>
>>
>> One observation/question regarding the white list: Stax API seems to
>> be missing. If so, wouldn't this meant that you could not use Stax
>> parsers on anything -- since API classes are not whitelisted, trying
>> to add api jar and load classes should fail?
>>
>>
> I would presume so. You might be able to add a renamed stax jar/impl to the
> war. It would be an interesting experiment to see if that would work with a
> modified Woodstox.
>
>
> If this is the case, it'd be another indication that what you get is
>> not really 1.6, but some arbitrary subset, perhaps just based on which
>> packages developers doing it happened to be aware of.
>>
>>
> It could be. Hard to fathom really without some details from the GAE
> developers themselves.
>
> Paul.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>
>
--
.......__o
.......\<,
....( )/ ( )...