On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:33 PM, António Mota wrote:
> Because of the "strongly typed entities"?
>
If i may be so bold to speak for Jaka... all i think Jaka wants to do
is utilize generic typing for the return type of resource methods. It
is essentially an implementation design detail for the server side
code. It does not affect what goes on the wire, nor the HTTP-based
contract between the client and server, nor breaks any REST constraints.
Paul.
>
>
> 2009/3/31 Jaka Jančar <jaka_at_kubje.org>:
>> On 31. Mar 2009, at 13:29, António Mota wrote:
>>>
>>> 2009/3/30 Jaka Jančar <jaka_at_kubje.org>:
>>>>
>>>> I want my resource methods to:
>>>> a) return strongly typed entities (so entity types can be
>>>> specified in
>>>> interfaces), and
>>>
>>> I'm just wondering, Jersey is about implementing REST-type
>>> architectures, and "strongly typed entities" is anything but
>>> RESTish... Why do you want to do that with Jersey and not stick to a
>>> RPC style?
>>
>> Why is this not RESTful?
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>