HI James,
Nice post. Here is a link for implicit/explicit views:
http://blogs.sun.com/sandoz/entry/mvcj
Nothing on the wiki yet :-( I tried posting a comment, but i need to
sign up and it forwarded me to a page in German (automatic transparent
proxies!) and so i gave up for now...
BTW the idea of the view approach came from Hudson, which uses it's
own framework called Stapler. I refined it to work with Jersey/JAX-RS
with a plugable system for template processing.
I am very keen to pursue this area further, but as of late i have not
had the time to focus on this as much as i would like. So is is great
to see the likes of yourself and others on the users list take an
interest and help out :-)
Paul.
On Jan 27, 2009, at 4:45 PM, James Strachan wrote:
> I've been pondering this for a little while; is JAX-RS the kinda long
> term replacement for all the zillions of web frameworks out there?
>
> I tend to think, yes it mostly is for most requirements - and we're
> nearly there, just a few things to fix up and improve. I've just
> blogged (a rather long post for me) about it, brain dumping my
> thoughts
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/2009/01/jax-rs-as-one-web-framework-to-rule.html
>
> it could well feed the trolls but it'd be interesting to hear if
> others have been having similar thoughts (or maybe I'm just smoking
> crack :). From seeing folks hit similar issues to me in the implicit
> views / static files /JSP mappings areas - it looks like at least a
> few folks are trying to do similar things.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://fusesource.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>