users@jersey.java.net

Re: [Jersey] Important bug found

From: Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:59:56 +0100

Hi Jeffrey,

Ouch. We will look into. BTW it is late over here in Europe...

Paul.

On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:49 PM, Jeffrey wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> Imagine having the following object-structure:
>
> Folder has, among other fields, a list of Pages and a list of
> Keywords.
> A Page has, among other fields, a list of Keywords.
> A Keyword has an id and a name.
>
> In this example we have and object model corresponding to the
> following xml:
> <folder>
> <id>id:folder</id>
> <keyword>
> <id>id:keywordfolder</id>
> <name>name:keywordfolder</name>
> </keyword>
> <name>name:folder</name>
> <page>
> <id>id:page</id>
> <keyword>
> <id>id:keywordpage</id>
> <name>name:keywordpage</name>
> </keyword>
> <name>name:page</name>
> </page>
> </folder>
>
>
> The expected json output, using a provider that generates the
> jettison format, is:
> {"folder":
> { "id":"id:folder",
> "keyword":
> {"id":"id:keywordfolder","name":"name:keywordfolder"},
> "name":"name:folder",
> "page":
> { "id":"id:page",
> "keyword":
> {"id":"id:keywordpage","name":"name:keywordpage"},
> "name":"name:page"
> }
> }
> }
>
> However, the generated json was:
> {"folder":
> { "id":"id:folder",
> "keyword":
> [ {"id":"id:keywordfolder","name":"name:keywordfolder"},
>
> {"id":"id:keywordpage","name":"name:keywordpage"}],
> "name":"name:folder",
> "page":{"id":"id:page"}
> },
> "name":"name:page"
> }
>
> As you can see the keyword belonging to the page object was put
> together (in an array) with the keyword of the folder.
> Besides this, the name of the page does not longer belong to the
> page but is part of the folder.
>
> I´ve attached a jersey application with a service that generates the
> following output. It is using the newest version released: 1.0.1.
> To use the service build the project, run BuggedServer.java and call
> the url: http://localhost:8002/services/bug
>
> We´re creating a business critical application based on jersey and
> are facing this bug since the migration from version 0.8 to 1.0.
> Do you have any idea how long it will take to fix it?
>
> Hoping to hear from you,
> Jeffrey
>
>
>
>
> Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeffrey,
>>
>> You can report it here on this list.
>>
>> Or you can log an issue here:
>>
>> https://jersey.dev.java.net/issues/
>>
>> to do the latter you will require a java.net account.
>>
>>
>> Note that we have just released version 1.0.1, perhaps it is fixed
>> in that release?
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Jeffrey wrote:
>>
>>> I´d like to registrer an important bug that I found yesterday, but
>>> i can´t find any relevant e-mail address to send the explication +
>>> application to demonstrate.
>>>
>>> Can you please explain where to send this recently introduzed bug
>>> (version 1.0).
>>>
>>> I´m looking forward to you answer,
>>> Jeffrey van Helden
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>>>
>>
>
> <bugged-json-
> application
> .zip
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net