On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 14:52 +0200, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 14:12 +0200, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> >> Actually thinking about it, we should probably put everything underneath
> >> the name "jersey":
> >>
> >> trunk/
> >> jersey/ # copying the convention used by Grizzly
> >> pom.xml
> >> contribs/
> >> spring/
> >> samples/
> >> modules/
> >> jersey/
> >> # and jersey will be modularized later e.g.
> >> # jersey-runtime/
> >> # jersey-jaxb/
> >> # jersey-json/
> >> # jersey-servlet/
> >>
> >> as it means we can easily build everything, meaningfully branch/tag
> >> everything, create bundles, and still retain a zip distribution for
> >> non-maven users.
> >
> > To build everything, IMHO you don't need the trunk/jersey folder, as you
> > could also have simply a trunk/pom.xml, so that trunk is the root for
> > everything. Or am I missing s.th.?
> >
>
> That is true, but i thought it would also make it easier to meaningfully
> tag everything as you just declare the new tag directory and the single
> meaningful directory you want to copy (rather than reusing 'trunk' or
> selecting all directories/files in trunk). For future releases of Jersey
> i think we should tag all source.
Hmm, I don't understand what you want to say :-/
> > So the argument for this would have to be to confirm to some convention
> > (grizzly) :)
> >
>
> Partially, because if we copy that structure i am sure it will make it
> easier to copy the release model.
Ok, I understand this :)
Cheers,
Martin
>
> Paul.