Hi,
I'm not familiar with eupl, as well as I'm not a lawyer, thus my
strong advice is to contact your legal department / lawyer with any
licencing questions.
MartiNG
FWIW, googling shows e.g. this page:
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/software/page/eupl/eupl-compatible-open-source-licences
On 29/01/14 10:26, Yoann Moranville wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm not quite sure this is the correct place to ask but maybe some
> developers have already had the same issue and could help me.
>
> We are thinking about releasing our work under the EUPL, however the
> jaxb implementation we use is released under CCDLv1.1+GPLv2
> (https://jaxb.java.net/2.2.6/).
> We are using the library via maven, so not modifying any code but
> using it as a library - the library is then assembled into our
> application (inside 1 jar - as I understood, called "static linking").
>
> So my question is: would it be possible to release our work under EUPL
> as it is? Or should we extract the library into a "lib" directory
> ("dynamic linking"?)? Would that be allowed? Or should we altogether
> think about releasing it under a different open source license?
>
> Thanks for the help,
> Yoann
--
Martin Grebac, SW Engineering Manager
Oracle Czech, Prague