So, does that mean it's impossible?
On 12/9/2011 9:14 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> This does not work, and it is contrary to the JAXB Specification, where
> it says that collectionType. if specified, must be either “indexed" or
> any fully qualified class name that implements java.util.List. java.util.Set
> does neither.
>
> xjc compiles, but the generated Java code is broken:
> protected List<FooType> foo = new Set<FooType>();
>
> -W
>
> On 09/12/2011, Farrukh Najmi<farrukh_at_wellfleetsoftware.com> wrote:
>> Try customizations in attached file. Note I have not actually tried it
>> and you may need to tweek. You should rename it to bindings.xjb per
>> default conventions.
>>
>> On 12/09/2011 11:01 AM, John G. Lussmyer wrote:
>>> Well, those docs do seem to imply it's possible, but darned if I can
>>> figure out the syntax needed.
>>>
>>> What I have is a<xs:complexType> that contains multiple elements.
>>> One element is:
>>> <xs:sequence>
>>> <xs:element name="ConsumerIdentifier" type="ConsumerIdentifier"
>>> minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>>> </xs:sequence>
>>> What I want is for the get/setConsumerIdentifier() methods to use
>>> Set<ConsumerIdentifier> instead of List<ConsumerIdentifier>.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions on xsd syntax needed?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/9/2011 4:17 AM, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>>> On 12/08/2011 12:23 PM, cougar_at_casadelgato.com wrote:
>>>>> Is there any way to have the xsd defined java objects have a Set
>>>>> instead of a List?
>>>>>
>>>> You need to use a jaxb |collectionType |customization either globally
>>>> or for a specific property binding:
>>>>
>>>> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17802_01/webservices/webservices/docs/1.5/tutorial/doc/JAXBUsing4.html
>>>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Farrukh Najmi
>>
>> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com
>>
>>
>>
--
--
John G. Lussmyer mailto:Cougar_at_CasaDelGato.Com
Electric Vehicle Battery Monitoring Systems, http://www.CasaDelGato.com