Hi all,
Is there someone who might know a fix to this problem? Is this a bug,
or am I doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance!
On 3 March 2011 13:41, Alexander Broekhuis <a.broekhuis_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've created an example. As can be seen, generating a model for B.xsd,
> also generates a ObjectFactory for an element from A.xsd. The content
> of this ObjectFactory is already in the generated files for A.xsd.
>
> A.xsd:
> ---------
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <schema elementFormDefault="qualified" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> xmlns:a="http://www.example.org/A/"
> targetNamespace="http://www.example.org/A/">
>
> <element name="someType" type="a:SomeType"></element>
>
> <complexType name="SomeType">
> <sequence>
> <element name="field" type="string"></element>
> </sequence>
> <attribute name="attr" type="string" />
> </complexType>
>
> </schema>
>
> --------
> B.xsd
> --------
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <schema elementFormDefault="qualified"
> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> xmlns:b="http://www.example.org/B/"
> xmlns:a="http://www.example.org/A/"
> targetNamespace="http://www.example.org/B/">
>
> <import namespace="http://www.example.org/A/" />
>
> <complexType name="SomeTypeGroup">
> <sequence>
> <element ref="a:someType" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> </sequence>
> </complexType>
>
>
> <element name="root" type="b:RootType"></element>
> <complexType name="RootType">
> <sequence>
> <element name="someTypes" type="b:SomeTypeGroup" />
> </sequence>
> </complexType>
> </schema>
>
> ---------
> catalog.xml
> ---------
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <catalog
> xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:entity:xmlns:xml:catalog">
>
> <public publicId="http://www.example.org/A/"
> uri="A.xsd"/>
>
> </catalog>
>
> --------
> Shell commands
> --------
> mkdir srcgen
> mkdir srcgen/a
> mkdir srcgen/b
> xjc -d srcgen/a -episode a.episode A.xsd
> xjc -d srcgen/b B.xsd -b a.episode -catalog catalog.xml -extension
> -classpath srcgen/a
>
> --------
>
>
> On 2 March 2011 21:08, Alexander Broekhuis <a.broekhuis_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thx for your reply.
>>
>> On 2 March 2011 18:32, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> There is no connection of the type/class names EventType and TypeType to the
>>> schema snippets. Please clarify this. A complete working example reproducing
>>> the effect would help.
>>
>> I "edited" my working example to something simpler, and forgot to
>> rename that one EventType. I will create a small working example
>> tomorrow.
>>
>>>
>>> But is it really necessary to use an episode file? Ususally, compiling all
>>> in one run is the way to go.
>>
>> The project I need this for is split into multiple parts. One scheme
>> belongs to a basic module, and can be extended by other modules. So
>> yes, unfortunately in this case it is needed.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Met vriendelijke groet,
>>
>> Alexander Broekhuis
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
> Alexander Broekhuis
>
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Alexander Broekhuis