it's not a stupid question if it helps get me closer to a solution (^_^)
but no, i really meant jaxP-1.4.2 and jaxB-2.1.4...
jaxb1 seems to work just fine with everything declared in the pom (api,
impl, xjc, and all that)
but because jaxb-2.0 was put into jdk1.5, we hafta replace it with
jaxb-api-2.1
(i used the jar that accompanied the jaxb 2.1.4 release, so i've been
referring to
it as the jaxb-api-2.1.4 but i'm under the impression that jaxb-api-2.1 is
unchanged;
it's just the impls that have been getting revved). i still depend on
jaxb-impl-2.1.4 in
my poms, but since the APIs were internalized, i don't declare them in the
pom anymore.
and i don't know what version of jaxp was internalized, but for other things
we do,
we must include both the jaxp-api and jaxp-ri (versions 1.4.2) in order for
all of
our other non-binding xml stuff to work.
Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
>
> Maybe this is a stupid question...
> "using jdk1.5.0_12 with jaxp-api-1.4.2, jaxp-ri-1.4.2, and jaxb-api-2.1.4"
> did you really mean to say jaxb-api-1.4.2 AND jaxb-api-2.1.4?
>
> I know I have had problems whenever I mixed 1.x and 2.x
>
> Malachi
>
> On 8/28/07, jesse crossley <jesse.crossley_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> we do all use the same repos for fetching jars from (an online repo and
>> an
>> additional repo shared via svn);
>> my concern is with the /USER_HOME/.m2/repository that maven downloads
>> jars
>> to...
>> those can get quite messy, especially during development cycles and when
>> updating versions of things,
>> but i *thought* that maven was better able to deal with such
>> things...that's
>> why i argued so vehemently for changing everything from ant to mvn.
>>
>> however, since i deleted my .m2/repository and then rebuilt and got
>> "getAny()"
>> and one of my coworkers started on a clean machine from scratch and get
>> "getAnies()"
>> then i get the feeling that something else may be amiss...
>>
>> hmmm, any chance that my Vista machine would end up doing things
>> differently
>> than their XP machines?
>>
>>
>>
>> Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
>> >
>> > Just a comment here...
>> >
>> > You mention that your repos might be different... You'd be better off
>> all
>> > pointing to a shared repo on the LAN. While it may not solve your
>> > problem,
>> > knowing that you might have different classes in the repos should be
>> > something to fix if you are looking for consistency.
>> >
>> > Malachi
>> >
>> > On 8/28/07, jesse crossley <jesse.crossley_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> so now that the rest of my development team is trying to build my new
>> >> modules, this problem is really killing me...
>> >> it seems that i can't control the "simpler & better" mode of JAXB:
>> >> using jdk1.5.0_12 with jaxp-api-1.4.2, jaxp-ri-1.4.2, and
>> jaxb-api-2.1.4
>> >> (are all jaxb 2.1 api jars equal?) added to my jre/lib/endorsed
>> directory
>> >> and using the maven-jaxb2-plugin-0.4 along with jaxb-impl-2.1.4
>> >> (v2.1.4-b02-fcs, according to generated code)
>> >> then when i generate classes from the soap envelope.xsd, i get a
>> >> Body.java
>> >> with a getAny() method, but my teammembers end up with a getAnies()
>> >> method.
>> >> we have the same pom.
>> >> we have the same jdk+endorsed.
>> >> we *may* have different files in our .m2/repos,
>> >> but i just deleted mine and tried again and my build succeeded.
>> >>
>> >> so how can i control the plural property names? is there some
>> >> configuration
>> >> i can do for the maven-jaxb2-plugin? do i need to use an older
>> version
>> >> of
>> >> the plugin, or a different version of jaxb? i really want to continue
>> >> using
>> >> latest&greatest, but i'll hafta back us up if i can't lockdown the
>> >> property
>> >> name issue. it doesn't really matter to us if it's singular or
>> plural;
>> >> it
>> >> just hasta be consistent on all environments.
>> >>
>> >> any insight anyone has would be most helpful.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> jesse crossley wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > have these gone back to singular names in the 2.1.4 release?
>> >> >
>> >> > my lists have gone from
>> >> > List<CircleRecord> getCircleRecords()
>> >> > back to List<CircleRecord> getCircleRecord()
>> >> > and i was wondering why...
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/jaxb-2.1.4-plural-property-names-tf4321622.html#a12377508
>> >> Sent from the java.net - jaxb users mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/jaxb-2.1.4-plural-property-names-tf4321622.html#a12377739
>> Sent from the java.net - jaxb users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jaxb-2.1.4-plural-property-names-tf4321622.html#a12378163
Sent from the java.net - jaxb users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.