Wagle, Shriniwas wrote:
> Having played with JAXB for some, I'm impressed that it was able to
> handle some really complex schemas quite well.
>
> However now that I have been browsing the available JAXB documentation
> for some time now, thought I'd share with the community my experience:
> 1. Good documentation was hard to find.
> 2. Documentation currently seems to be a collection of articles and
> faqs, blogs etc. which address lots of issues but don't come across as
> comprehensive enough.
My current effort is to build up
https://jaxb.dev.java.net/guide/ based
on interactions with users.
> 3. Some documentation is just not right (may be it is just dated).
> 3. I think that the JAXB product is quite important and feels robust
> now. So might be a time to gift wrap it such that people love it?
I agree the important of the documentation.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com