> HeruMartinus.Salim_at_infineon.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yup, I'm working on some plugin, but unfortunately the
> plugin is about
> > specific to the project. So I don't know weather it's gonna
> useful for
> > the other.
> >
> > What I made so far is to "customize" the behavior of
> code-generating
> > of XJC. For example when it meets a single attribute, few expected
> > functions/methods are gonna generated. And when it's
> multiple (list),
> > another thing will be generated. And also for example, I
> disable the
> > getter function for single type of a class, and such like that.
> > What come in my mind could be useful for the other is the
> ability of
> > customization to disable the setter and getter function, or
> to replace
> > the code (such as code-injector, but a bit more dramatic changes).
>
> Right.
>
> > When there are some advise on creating (extend to ) more generic
> > plugin, I would like to do that. Just I don't have enough
> experience
> > to know the needs of other programmers. Please some advice.
>
> If you could still host your plugin on jaxb2-commons. Once we
> can see the code, we can probably give you a better advice
> about how it can be generalized. Even if that doesn't work,
> it's still very useful as a teaching material, because you do
> some interesting stuff that other plugins don't do.
>
Ok, I'll do. Maybe in few days, after a bit elaborating.
Thanks.
Regards,
Heru