Perhaps I wasn't clear. The currently functionality allows for _all_
of the generated classes to have a common superclass (or interface).
The functionality I am after is to be able to specify this on a node
by node basis.
cheers
dim
On 6/28/06, Kasia Trapszo <kasia_at_trapszo.com> wrote:
> It's a common requirement:
>
> http://java.sun.com/webservices/docs/2.0/jaxb/
> vendorCustomizations.html#superclass
>
> On Jun 27, 2006, at 9:28 PM, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm assuming this isn't possible, but am wondering why not. I would
> > like some of my generated classes to have a common super interface.
> > Whilst technically speaking it might make more sense to do through
> > through schema inheritance, in this case I don't have that level on
> > control.
> >
> > Does anyone else have this need? Is it actually possible?
> >
> > cheers
> > dim
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>
>