Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi_at_sun.com> wrote:
>>
>> Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
>> > 2) the .xjb bindings... don't they have to be associated with specific
>> > schemas? ie: wouldn't a HashMap work better than ArrayList?
>>
>> No, they don't. A list is suffice, actually.
>
>
> Any reason we can't just specify the parent directory and let it find them
> recursively like it does with the XSD files?
We do that. In XJC ant task you can do:
<binding dir="src/main/schemas" includes="**/*.jaxb" />
or something like that.
> Yeah, I understand that. I had considered calling the Ant task directly at
> first too. And I do think there are specific people that it would be easier
> for.
I really want just one Maven2 plugin with one syntax. I'm just trying to
better understand what syntax works better.
> But, you know, you are the Code-Autogeneration-Guru. Why haven't you
> written a tool that will auto-create both of them? ;)
:-)
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com