Mark Brouwer wrote:
>
> Thanks Kohsuke for dealing with this in such a timely fashion! From
> https://jaxb.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88 I was able to
> conclude we have JAXB 1.0 under the CDDL very soon, and the weekly build
> of last night is indeed available under the CDDL.
>
> Some other small things I noticed:
>
> 1) you might want to alter the license mentioned at
> https://jaxb.dev.java.net/1.0/
>
Thanks - we'll fix it.
> 2) it is not clear to me whether the license for the source files in
> the javax.xml namespace is CDDL as they don't contain the same
> header as the files in the com.sun namespace.
>
I guess you're referring to the 1.0 codebase - I don't think we bundle
that package with JAXB now that it is integrated in the JDK. Kohsuke
changed all of the source code headers - I'll wait for him to chime in...
> A question however with regard to CVS access, I noticed that even with
> JAXB 2.0 it is much harder to get CVS access than with e.g. the
> GlassFish project. Is this going to change any time soon?
Yes, we are working on it. We will gradually switch over to CDDL as
quickly as possible - there are a couple technical/logistical issues
that we are working on before the CVS access will be easier. I expect
that we will completely switch over to CDDL by the end of next week
or so.
Thanks,
--Ryan