users@jaxb.java.net

Re: JAXB 2.0 overall question

From: Sekhar Vajjhala <Sekhar.Vajjhala_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:14:46 -0500

Please see the following thread on JAXB 2.0 forum
for answers to your questions.

    http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=422&tstart=0

The above forum is intended for JAXB 2.0 related discussions.

regards,
Sekhar

Brian Pontarelli wrote:

>
> I've been reading through the specification a bit and also playing
> around with the JAXB 2.0 early release and I just had a few questions
> in general.
>
> 1. It seems that the specification is still mostly making references
> to interfaces, implementations, etc. which are no longer used in JAXB
> 2.0 as far as I can tell from playing around with the implementation.
> Is there a more recent specification than the Early Draft Release from
> July 2004?
>
> 2. The JAXB compiler now generates POJOs (for all intents and
> purposes) that contain a bunch of annotations. The annotations seem to
> be what drives everything. What support will there be for using custom
> classes and enums rather than JAXB generated classes? It appears that
> if I annotate my classes and write a custom binding file I don't
> really need to use any JAXB generated classes, but I'm still forced to
> use the generated enums. Does that seem correct?
>
> 3. The JAXB compiler is using annotations and classes that aren't in
> the javadoc, is there an update on that at all?
>
> Thanks,
> Brian Pontarelli
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>