> I realize that upon unmarshalling I will get distinct objects with the
> same contents in the list, but this was just a convenient shortcut for
> us to take (as opposed to cloning foo before adding it a second time).
> Is this a bug in the validator, or is this behaving as designed?
When the code has written, indeed it was our intention to flag sub-tree
sharings as errors.
But I'm not sure if the spec says anything at all about it, and I can
see that there is some value in doing it. So perhaps should we make it a
warning and leave it up to users to ignore or abort?
regards,
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net