Ryan Shoemaker - JavaSoft East wrote:
> Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>
>>> The schema I am using (the IFX v 1.4.0 schema) always declares
>>> everything as
>>> a XSD type (Simple or Complex) and then declares elements to be of that
>>> type. This results in both a generated 'Type' and 'Element' interfaces
>>> (along with the \impl classes as well). Is there a binding option
>>> for XJC
>>> to reduce this?
>>
>>
>>
>> No, not really. Sorry.
>>
>
> There are other schemas that have similar issues - UDDI and UBL come to
> mind...
Out of curiosity: Would that still match the JAXB specification? I would
like to introduce such a switch to JaxMe, because I do not like that many
classes myself, but did not, for reasons of compatibility to the RI.
Jochen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net