Just came across this in trying to clean up an email backlog. At the
time I did the original benchmarks XMLBeans was proprietary with a
license that prohibited benchmarks without prior approval. I asked and
was turned down. Now that it's in Apache I'd love to try it out. My
expectation is that it's probably slightly faster than JAXB (but not
JiBX, of course :-) ) for just input and output of documents, but slower
when it comes to actually using the document as data-bound objects
(because it does lazy construction of the objects, with write-through of
changes to the backing store).
I'll try to get an update out before too long. I've just released the
Beta 3 version of JiBX (
http://www.jibx.org), and JAXB is probably
cleaned up from the Beta version I tested. I'll let the list know when I
get an update out.
- Dennis
Pratt, Jerald wrote:
>Dennis,
>
>Do you have any idea where BEA XmlBeans fits in the Benchmark results? I
>noticed it was not included. Do you have any plans of running the
>benchmarks against XmlBeans?
>
>Jerald Pratt
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:dms_at_sosnoski.com]
>Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 11:40 PM
>To: users_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>Subject: Re: Benchmarks
>
>
>Hopefully I didn't violate the beta terms when I wrote the article - I
>do try to be careful about obeying the licenses when publishing
>benchmarks, and so far have not received any complaints. The current
>licensing of JWSDP components appears to prohibit benchmarking (or any
>public discussion, for that matter) of the EA components, but does not
>appear to have any restrictions for the released components.
>
>I'll run a new set of tests when I have some time available and publish
>updated results.
>
> - Dennis
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net