From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 09:09:03 -0700

Which version of the RI are you using? I checked JWSDP1.2 but I failed
to reproduce the problem.

Gerry Plummer <gerry_at_TELOQUENT.COM> wrote:
> The generated code includes javadoc comments for the various getter/setter methods. If a property can be empty (schema has minOccurs=0)then the comments for the getter/setter methods attempt to show that null is a possible/valid parameter, as well as the type of a valid, non-null parameter, using a javadoc @link tag. The {_at_link null} produces huge numbers of annoying javadoc warnings that clutter up our build logs. E.g.
>
> N:\java\com\teloquent\net\message\bind\tqlink\ReasonType.java:44: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: null
>
> Here's part of the generated class:
>
>
> /** * Java content class for ReasonType complex type.
> * <p>The following schema fragment specifies the expected content contained within this java content object.
> * <p>
> * <pre>
> * &lt;complexType name="ReasonType">
> * &lt;complexContent>
> * &lt;restriction base="{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}anyType">
> * &lt;sequence>
> * &lt;element name="Code" type="{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}int"/>
> * &lt;element name="Description" type="{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}string" minOccurs="0"/>
> * &lt;/sequence>
> * &lt;/restriction>
> * &lt;/complexContent>
> * &lt;/complexType>
> * </pre>
> */
> public interface ReasonType {
>
> /**
> *
> * @return possible object is
> * {_at_link null}
> * {_at_link java.lang.String}
> */
> java.lang.String getDescription();
>
> /**
> *
> * @param value allowed object is
> * {_at_link null}
> * {_at_link java.lang.String}
> */
> void setDescription(java.lang.String value);
>
> int getCode();
>
> void setCode(int value);
>
> }


regards,

--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi                  408-276-7063 (x17063)
Sun Microsystems                   kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com